High CourtsSingle Bench

Manharan vs State Of Chhattisgarh AndOrs

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 22 February 2018 · Citation: (2018) 02 CHH CK 0373

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 486 Of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 141 words

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1.

Heard.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that land has been acquired and compensation has been determined, but it is not being paid.

3.

Learned State counsel, on advance copy and on instructions, would submit that the land is recorded in the name of seven persons jointly and if all

the seven persons apply jointly or through an authorised person amongst one of them, then the amount can be disbursed within no time.

4.

In view of the above, the petitioner i.e. the owners of the land are at liberty to approach the authorities either jointly or through an authorised person

amongst one of them and respondent No.2 Collector would do the needful and disburse the compensation expeditiously.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).