High CourtsSingle Bench

Mani Kumar Subba vs State Of Sikkim & Ors

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 31 March 2023 · Citation: (2023) 03 SIK CK 0061

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 52 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 121 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

I.A. No. 01 of 2023

An application for placing on record Office Order dated 14.02.2023 has been filed by the State-respondents. Mr. Yam Kumar Subba, learned counsel for the petitioner desires to file response to the same. Four weeks to do so is granted. On 22.02.2023 the learned Government Advocate had sought three weeks time to file counter-affidavit it has not yet been filed. The learned Additional Advocate General seeks a final opportunity to do so. The counter-affidavit is important in writ petition which are decided on affidavits. Considering the above, four weeks time is granted to the respondents to file counter affidavit. Two weeks thereafter, to the petitioner to file rejoinder, if any.

List on 19.05.2023.