AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
69 paragraphs · 650 wordsThe petitioner is aggrieved with the fact that the
land, owned by the petitioner, having an extent of 0.1093
Hectors in R.S No.371/7 in Block No.37 of Marutha Road
Village in Palakkadu District, is shown as ''nilam'' in the revenue
records. The said property of the petitioner is said to be
included in the data bank prepared under Section 5(4)(1) of
the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act,
2008 (for brevity ''the Paddy Land Act''). The petitioner filed
Ext.P8 application, before the 3rd respondent, for removal of
entry in respect of their properties from the draft data bank
and Ext.P9; an application filed under Clause (6) of the Kerala
Land Utilization Order, 1967, (for brevity "KLU Order") before
the additional 5th respondent for conversion of use of land,
which are pending consideration. The prayer of the petitioner
is to direct the 3rd and additional 5th respondents herein, to
consider and dispose of Exts.P8 and P9 applications
In such circumstance, since, the petitioner in
the aforesaid writ petition seeks a direction to the 3rd
respondent to delete the property of the petitioner from the
data bank and declare that the property of the petitioner is
not liable to be included in the data bank. Such a relief can be
appropriately sought before the Local Level Monitoring
Committee as per the amendment brought to the Paddy Land
Act by the amended Rule 4(6) of the Kerala Paddy Land and
Wetland Rules, 2008. Hence the 3rd respondent is directed to
consider the request under the amendment G.O.(P)
No.34/2017/Revenue dated 30.05.2017 for removing the
property from the data bank after conducting site inspection
and ascertaining the nature of land as on the date of
enforcement of the Paddy Land Act and with report received
from the Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment
Center (KSREC), if the application is filed in original and
pending before the authority.
Since the land is included in the draft data
bank and the description is shown as ''nilam'' in the revenue
records, it is only proper that a report is received from the
Local Level Monitoring Committee (LLMC) and Kerala State
Remote Sensing and Environment Center (KSREC) before
consideration of Ext.P9 application by the additional 5th
respondent, if the same is filed in original and pending before
the authority.
The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ
petition before the Agricultural Officer, the Convener of the
Local Level Monitoring Committee, along with the copy of the
Field Measurement Book and Survey and Sub-division
numbers with respect to the property obtained from the
concerned Village Officer. The Agricultural Officer, shall seek a
report of the lie and nature of the property as it remained on
the date of coming into force of the Kerala Conservation of
Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008, from the Director, Kerala
State Remote Sensing and Environment Center (KSREC), Vikas
Bhavan, C-Block, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695 033. On
the direction of the Agricultural Officer so to do, the petitioner
shall remit the required fees in the name of the petitioners,
C/o. the concerned Agricultural Officer (showing the full
address) before the KSREC for obtaining such report and
produce such receipt before the Agricultural Officer. The
Agricultural Officer shall then obtain the report and map from
the KSREC, who shall issue the same on the strength of the
receipt produced by the Agricultural Officer. The Agricultural
Officer, on receipt of the report, shall require the LLMC to
conduct physical inspection of the property and then the
LLMC shall consider the application at Ext.P8 in accordance
with law. If the LLMC permits it, the additional 5th respondent
shall consider Ext.P9 application to obtain conversion of user
under Clause (6) of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 and
also in accordance with M.K.Shivadasan v. Revenue
Divisional Officer [2017 (3) KLT 822].
The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs
