AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
59 paragraphs · 553 wordsThe petitioners are aggrieved with the fact that the
lands, having an extent of 10 Cents owned by the 1st
petitioner and 16 Cents owned by the 2nd petitioner
comprised in Survey No.202/2 of Edavilangu Village are
shown as ''nilam'' in the village records and basic tax
register. The properties of the petitioners are not included
in the draft data bank prepared under Section 5(4)(i) of the
Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act,
2008. The petitioners'' properties are lying as a pucca
garden land for more than 35 years and there are age old
coconut trees and other trees in the said properties, is the
contention raised. The petitioners filed Ext.P4 application,
before the 2nd respondent, which is pending consideration.
The prayer of the petitioners is to direct the Revenue
Divisional Officer (RDO), the 2nd respondent herein, to
consider and dispose of Ext.P4, an application filed under
Clause (6) of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967, (for
brevity "KLU Order"), within a reasonable time.
Since the lands are not included in the draft data
bank and the description is shown as ''nilam'' in the Basic
Tax Register (B.T.R), it is only proper that a report is
received from the Local Level Monitoring Committee
(LLMC) and Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment
Center (KSREC) before consideration of Ext.P4 application
by the 2nd respondent, if the same is filed in original and
pending before the authority.
The petitioners shall produce a copy of the writ
petition before the Agricultural Officer, the Convener of the
LLMC, along with the copy of the Field Measurement Book
and Survey and Sub-division numbers with respect to the
properties obtained from the concerned Village Officer. The
Agricultural Officer shall then seek a report of the lie and
nature of the properties as it remained on the date of
coming into force of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land
and Wet Land Act, 2008, from the Director, Kerala State
Remote Sensing and Environment Center (KSREC), Vikas
Bhavan, C-Block, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695 033.
On the direction of the Agricultural Officer so to do, the
petitioners shall remit the required fees in the name of the
petitioners, C/o. the concerned Agricultural Officer
(showing the full address) before the KSREC for obtaining
such report and produce such receipt before the
Agricultural Officer. The Agricultural Officer shall then
obtain the report and map from the KSREC, who shall issue
the same on the strength of the receipt produced by the
Agricultural Officer. The Agricultural Officer, on receipt of
the report, shall require the LLMC to conduct physical
inspection of the properties and submit a report before the
RDO as to the lie and nature of the properties, as it exists at
present, along with the report from the KSREC. A copy of
the report of physical inspection conducted by the LLMC
and of the report of the KSREC shall be issued to the
petitioners on an application made.
On receipt of the report of the LLMC, along with
the satellite map and report forwarded by the KSREC, the
2nd respondent shall issue notice to the petitioners and
consider the application, within a period of two months from
the date of receipt of the report of the Agricultural Officer.
The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.
