High CourtsSingle Bench

Manish Kumar vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 3 May 2018 · Citation: (2018) 05 CHH CK 0009

HON’BLE JUDGES
ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No.364 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 457 words
1.

This revision has been preferred against the order dated 25.1.2018 passed by the Special Judge under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act (henceforth 'the Act'), Raigarh in Crime No.168 of 2017 registered under Section 20(b) of the Act. By the impugned order, the

Special Judge has rejected the application moved by the present Applicant for release of his vehicle on supurdnama.

2.

The Applicant is the owner of a Tata Indica Car bearing registration No.UP 72 AT 1485 which was seized in Crime No.168 of the 2017 registered

at Police Station Sariya, District Raigarh for offence punishable under Section 20(b) of the Act. As per the prosecution story, on 27.12.2017, on

receiving information, the said car was searched and 25 Kgs. of Ganja was recovered from the possession of the accused who was sitting in the said

car. An application for release of the said car on supurdnama was filed by the present Applicant before the Special Judge, which has been rejected by

the impugned order dated 25.1.2018. Hence, this revision.

3.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that the Applicant is the registered owner of the car. He was not involved in the crime in

question. He is not the accused in the case. No proceeding relating to confiscation of the car is pending. Charge-sheet has been filed. The car is kept

idle in an open place of the police station since 27.12.2017. This would lead to depreciation in value of the car. Therefore, the car may be released and

handed over to the Applicant on supurdnama.

4.

Per contra, Learned Counsel appearing for the State/Respondent supports the impugned order.

5.

I have heard Learned Counsel appearing for the parties and perused the material available with due care.

6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly that the car is kept idle in an open place of the police station since 27.12.2017, no

proceeding relating to confiscation of the car is pending and value of the car may be depreciated on its remaining kept unused for long, I am inclined to

allow the present revision and release the car on supurdnama.

7.

Accordingly, the revision is allowed. The vehicle Tata Indica Car bearing registration No.UP 72 AT 1485 be released in favour of the Applicant on

a supurdnama on furnishing a surety in the sum of Rupees Five Lakhs to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court with the following conditions

that during pendency of the trialâ€

(i) no third party transfer of the vehicle shall be done by the Applicant,

(ii) paint and look/design of the vehicle shall not be changed and

(iii) whenever order for submission of the vehicle is issued, the same shall be complied with on time.