High CourtsSingle Bench

Smt. Shanti Gain vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 3 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 04 CHH CK 0018

HON’BLE JUDGES
ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 451
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No.322 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 392 words
1.

The revision is listed for hearing on admission. With the consent of Learned Counsel appearing for the parties, it is heard and decided finally.

2.

The revision has been preferred against the order dated 14.12.2017 passed by the Special Judge under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act, Ambikapur in Special Case No.7 of 2017 rejecting the application of the Applicant under Section 451 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure.

3.

Facts of the case, in brief, are that on 8.12.2016, on receiving secret information from an informant, total 573 pieces of Rexogesic Injections kept by

accused Pradeep, son of the present Applicant in the dickey of a Scooty bearing registration No.CG 15 CX 4441 were seized from his possession.

The present Applicant is the registered owner of the said Scooty. She moved an application under Section 451 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

before the Special Judge for receiving back her Scooty on supurdnama. The said application has been rejected by the impugned order dated

14.12.2017. Hence, this revision.

4.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that the Applicant is the registered owner of the Scooty. The Scooty is kept in an open place

in the police station since December, 2016. Engine of the vehicle is likely to become out of order. No proceeding for confiscation of the Scooty is

pending.

5.

Per contra, Learned Counsel appearing for the State/Respondent supports the impugned order.

6.

I have heard Learned Counsel appearing for the parties and perused the material available with due care.

7.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly that the vehicle is kept in an open place of the police station since December,

2016, no proceeding relating to confiscation of the vehicle is pending and value of the vehicle may be depreciated on its remaining kept unused for

long, I am inclined to allow the present revision and release the vehicle on supurdnama.

8.

Accordingly, the revision is allowed. The aforesaid Scooty be released in favour of the Applicant on a supurdnama with the following conditions that

during pendency of the trialâ€

(i) no third party transfer of the vehicle shall be done by her,

(ii) paint and look/design of the vehicle shall not be changed and

(iii) whenever order for submission of the vehicle is issued, the same shall be complied with on time.