Supreme CourtDivision Bench

Md.Sahar Ali vs State Of Assam

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 14 February 2019 · Citation: (2019) 02 SC CK 0310

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.M. Khanwilkar, J · Ajay Rastogi, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 1603 Of 2008
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 126 words
1.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State prays for time on the ground that the arguing counsel/advocate-on-record for the respondent is in personal difficulty.

2.

The matter was adjourned on the previous occasion to enable the learned counsel for the State to take instructions whether the sole appellant has expired, as was stated by the counsel for the appellant.

3.

There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the statement made by the learned counsel for the appellant nor to keep this appeal pending. Accordingly, the appeal abates. Papers be consigned to the records.

4.

In case the above factual position is incorrect, it will be open to the respondent to move an appropriate application, which shall be considered on its own merits.