AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 184 wordsHon''ble Prafulla C. Pant, J.—Applicant-Meharban who is in jail in connection with crime no. 130 of 2011, relating to offence punishable u/s 302 IPC, Police Station Sahaspur, District Dehradun, has sought his release on bail.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Applicant is not named in the FIR. It is a case of circumstantial evidence. Learned counsel for the applicant pleaded that the applicant has been implicated on the basis of statement of the accused Jishan and Yakoob which cannot be read in evidence as against him. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State pointed out that recovery of knife is said to have been made on pointing out of the applicant. There is no criminal history of the applicant.
In the above circumstances, without expressing any opinion as to final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail.
The bail application is allowed. Let applicant Meharban be released on bail on executing personal bond, and furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun.
