High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohammad Rajat vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 6 December 2023 · Citation: (2023) 12 UK CK 0042

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 147, 148, 149, 307, 332, 333, 353 · Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1967 — Section 7
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 2601 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 157 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Mohammad Rajat is in judicial custody in FIR No.121 of 2017, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 332, 333, 353 IPC and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1967, Police Station-Bajpur, District- Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused, having similar role, have already been granted bail. The applicant has no previous criminal history.

4.

Learned State Counsel admits these facts.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.