High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohan Chandra Suyal vs Chandra Shekhar Sanwal

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 7 September 2021 · Citation: (2021) 09 UK CK 0092

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 135 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 176 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

WPSS No. 140 of 2013 filed by the petitioner was disposed of with a direction to the Conservator of Forest to consider petitioner's claim for appointment in the light of letter dated 15.04.2011 issued by Divisional Forest Officer, Haldwani.

2.

A compliance affidavit has been filed by Mr. Chandra Shekhar Sanwal, Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Haldwani Tikonia Forest Campus, Haldwani, District Nainital. Annexure -CA2 to the said compliance affidavit is an order passed by Chief Conservator of Forest on 19.01.2018. Perusal of the said order indicates that petitioner's claim for appointment was considered and rejected.

3.

Since the only direction issued by Writ Court was to consider petitioner's claim for appointment, which has now been considered, therefore, in the considered opinion of this Court, nothing survives in this contempt petition.

4.

Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed. Notice issued to the opposite party is hereby discharged. However, petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the rejection order dated 19.01.2018 passed by Principal Chief Conservator of Forest before the appropriate forum.