High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohd. Anwar vs State of Punjab and Another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 24 April 2006 · Citation: (2006) 04 P&H CK 0035

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.M. Aggarwal, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Copyright Act, 1957 — Section 51, 53 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 420
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 26187-M of 2005
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 158 words

M.M. Aggarwal, J.—This is a petition for quashing of FIR No. 347 dated 18.12.2002 registered at Police Station, Malerkotla under Sections 51/53/63/67 of Copy Right Act, 1957 and Section 420 IPC.

2.

Counsel for the petitioner argues that petitioner had a license copy Annexure P-1 and he could run movie in his Video Parlor. That a case was wrongly registered against him at the instance of respondent No. 2 who claims himself to be Manager of Harbhajan Singh Mann. That petitioner had a license but that license could not be produced at the time of raid.

3.

Counsel for respondent No. 2 says that parties have since compromised. Copy of the compromise is Annexure P-5 to which both the parties agree.

4.

Taking into account the nature of the offence and the fact that petitioner had valid license and the complainant has since compromised, this petition is accepted and FIR No. 347 dated 18.12.2002 is quashed.

Petition allowed.