AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
13 paragraphs · 499 wordsAlok Kumar Verma, J
The present Application has been filed by the applicants for anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 258 of 2025, registered at Police Station Pathri, District Haridwar under Section 3, Section 5 read with Section 11 of the Uttarkhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007.
As per the First Information Report dated 08.05.2025, the police party received a secret information that Ujefa, Amjad, Sahib (applicants), Arshad and Sajid are slaughtering a cow. The police party raided the spot. They observed that five persons were present on the spot. One co-accused Sajid was arrested. Four persons managed to escape from the spot. The police party recovered 150 kg. beef and other articles from the spot. The co-accused Sajid told that Ujefa, Amjad, Sahib and Arshad were also involved in slaughtering the cow.
Heard Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder for the State.
Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate, for the applicants contended that the applicants have been falsely implicated by the police and the co-accused Sajid. Applicants were not present on the spot. Noting was recovered from their possession. They have no criminal antecedents. They are permanent residents of District Haridwar, therefore, there is no possibility of their absconding, and, the co-accused Arshad has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.584 of 2025.
Mr. Pradeep Lohani, learned Brief Holder for the State, has opposed the anticipatory bail application orally.
Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.
Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the present Application, filed for anticipatory bail, is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicants Mohd. Huzefa alias Ujefa, Rihan alias Amjad and Sufiyan alias Sahib, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions:-
(i) Applicants shall cooperate with the Investigating Agency and they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) If the charge-sheet is filed, the applicants shall attend the trial court regularly and they shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment;
(iii) Applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case.
(iv) Applicants shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the trial court.
It is made clear that if the applicants misuse or violate any of the conditions, imposed upon them, the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.
