High CourtsSingle Bench

Tufail And Another vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 9 April 2025 · Citation: (2025) 04 UK CK 0808

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Uttarakhand Protection Of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 — Section 3, 5, 11 · Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 21
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 361 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 426 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

The present Application has been filed by the applicants for anticipatory bail under Section 3, Section 5 read with Section 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 in Case Crime No.386 of 2025, registered at Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar.

2.

As per the FIR, the police party received a secret information on 05.04.2025 that Tufail, Sajjad (the present applicants) and five other named accused are slaughtering cows. The police party raided the spot and recovered 150 kg. beef and other articles from the spot. All the accused managed to escape from the spot.

3.

Heard Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State.

4.

Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate, contended that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present matter. They are innocent persons. They were not present on the spot. Nothing was recovered from their possession. Applicants are permanent residents of District Haridwar, therefore, there is no possibility of their absconding.

5.

Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, A.G.A., has opposed the anticipatory bail application orally.

6.

Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.

7.

Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the present application, filed for anticipatory bail, is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicants, Tufail and Sajjad, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/ - and two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions: -

(i) Applicants shall cooperate with the Investigating Agency and they shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) If the charge-sheet is filed, the applicants shall attend the trial court regularly and they shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment;

(iii) Applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case.

(iv) Applicants shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the trial court.

8.

It is clarified that if the applicants misuse or violate any of the conditions, imposed upon them, the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.