High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohd. Kaleem & Another vs Mamta Kensey & Other

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 3 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 UK CK 0033

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 261 Of 2013
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 146 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioners filed WPSS No. 1027 of 2011 against cancellation of selection for the post of Primary School Teacher. The said writ petition was

allowed and respondents were directed to issue appointment letter to the petitioners.

2.

This contempt petition was filed with the allegation that the order passed by writ court has not been complied with.

3.

Today, Ms. Monika Pant, learned counsel for the respondent has made a statement that the order passed by writ court has been complied with,

inasmuch as, both the petitioners have been offered appointment as Primary School Teacher and they are presently serving in the school run by

Cantonment Board, Roorkee.

4.

In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the respondent, nothing survives in this contempt petition.

5.

Accordingly, contempt petition is dismissed. Notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged.