High CourtsSingle Bench

Mohd Shokeen vs Shahida Begum

Delhi High Court · Decided on 25 September 2019 · Citation: (2019) 09 DEL CK 0331

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e), 14D
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
RC.Revision No. 534 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 209 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

RC.REV. 534/2019 & CM APPL.40461/2019 (stay)

1.

Petitioner impugns order dated 10.05.2019, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.

2.

Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) and 14D of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from Property No.17/44, Part of Khasra No.275, Zakhir Nagar, Okhla, New Delhi-110025.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

4.

Petitioner, who is present in Court in person, undertakes that petitioner shall vacate and handover the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises on or before 31.10.2019. He further undertakes that he shall clear all water, electricity and other charges in respect of the tenanted premises before he vacates the premises. He further undertakes that he shall not sublet, assign or part with the possession of the tenanted premises or any part thereof.

5.

The undertaking is accepted.

6.

The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

7.

On petitioner filing an affidavit of undertaking, within one week in the above terms, execution of the impugned order shall remain stayed till 31.10.2019.

8.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.