High CourtsSingle Bench

Sahid vs Insha Allah @ Noor Jahan Begum

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 January 2020 · Citation: (2020) 01 DEL CK 0118

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
RC.Revision No. 186 Of 2018, Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 17801, 23936 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 379 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

RC.REV. 186/2018 & CM APPL.17801/2018 (stay), CM APPL.23936/2018 (stay)

1.

Petitioner impugns order dated 09.01.2018, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order

passed.

2.

Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of

the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from two rooms, one bedroom, one dalan, courtyard, kitchen, bathroom and latrine in the ground floor of property

No.2086, Ward No.XI, Kucha Nahar Khan, Daryaganj, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction

petition.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. He further submits that he has instructions on behalf of the petitioner to

undertake that petitioner shall vacate and handover the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before

31.10.2020. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes on behalf of the petitioner that the arrears of rent occupation charges shall be cleared by

the petitioner within six weeks. He further undertakes that the petitioner shall pay use and occupation charges at the agreed rate of rent.

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner further undertakes on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner shall clear all water, electricity and other

dues/charges in respect of the tenanted premises before the petitioner vacates the premises on or before 31.10.2020. Learned counsel for the

Petitioner further undertakes on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner shall not sublet, assign or part with the possession of the tenanted premises

or any part thereof. He further undertakes that petitioner shall not cause any damage to the tenanted premises and shall hand over the peaceful and

vacant possession of the tenanted premises in the same condition as it exists today subject to normal wear and tear.

5.

The undertaking is accepted.

6.

Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that the undertaking is acceptable to the respondent.

7.

Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

8.

Subject to petitioner filing an affidavit of undertaking in the above terms, within a period of two weeks, execution of the impugned order dated

09.01.2018 shall remain stayed till 31.10.2020.

9.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.