High CourtsDivision Bench

Mohendra Nath Chakraburtty vs Ramtaran Bandapadhya and Others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 19 June 1919 · Citation: 55 Ind. Cas. 96

HON’BLE JUDGES
Walmsley, J · Syed Shamsul Huda, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Order 41 Rule 23

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 109 words

Walmsley, J.—A preliminary objection is taken in this case that no appeal lies. The order complained of is an order remanding the case to the first Court. Apparently the order is not made under Order XLI, Rule 23, Civil Procedure Code, and it is only against an order of remand under that rule that an appeal is allowed by the Code. I think the objection must be sustained and the appeal dismissed with costs, hearing fee one gold mohur.

2.

The cross-objection is not pressed and is dismissed with costs. Let the record be sent down at once to the lower Appellate Court.

Shamsul Huda, J.

3.

I agree.