High Courts

Mohendra Nath Chakravarti vs Ramtaran Bando-Padhya and Another

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 17 June 1919 · Citation: (1919) 06 CAL CK 0002

RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Appeal From Order No. 46 of 1918

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 106 words

Walmsley, J.—A preliminary objection is taken in this case that no appeal lies. The order complained of is an order remanding the case to the first Court. Apparently the order is not made under Or. XLI, r. 23, C.P.C, and it is only against an order of remand under that Rule that an appeal is allowed by the Code. I think the objection must be sustained and the appeal dismissed with costs; hearing fee, one gold mohur. The cross-objection is not pressed and is dismissed without costs.

2.

Let the record be sent down at once to the lower Appellate Court.

Shamsul Huda, J.

I agree.