AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
23 paragraphs · 465 wordsThis first application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 has been filed by applicant, who is implicated in connection with Crime
No.278/2013 registered at Police Station Agar, District Agar Malwa (MP) for offence punishable under Sections 363, 366 and 376 (2) (n) of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860 and also under Section 3 read with Section 4 and Section 5 (L) read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual
Offence Act, 2012.
As per prosecution case, on the basis of the allegations made by the prosecutrix regarding abduction and commission of rape on the pretext of
marriage, the case has been registered against the present applicant.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in the present
crime.
The prosecutrix has been examined before the trial Court on 07.12.2019 and she does not state anything against the applicant and turns hostile.
According to her Court statement, she was major at the time of incident; had gone with the applicant on her own will; later on, solemnized marriage
with him; and now she is having three children from the wedlock of the applicant. Under these circumstances, no alleged offence is made out against
the applicant. The applicant is in custody since 21.08.2019. The investigation is over and charge sheet has already been filed. There is no possibility of
his / her absconsion or tampering with the evidence, if enlarged on bail. Conclusion of the trial will take sufficiently long time. Under these
circumstances, learned counsel for the applicant prays for grant of bail to the applicant.
Learned Public Prosecutor for the non-applicant / State of Madhya Pradesh opposes the bail application by contending that no sufficient ground is
made out for releasing the applicant on bail; hence he prayed for rejection of the application.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, but without commenting on the
merits of the case, the application filed by the applicant is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail upon his / her furnishing a personal
bond in the sum  of        Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of
trial Court, for his / her regular appearance before the trial Court during trial with a condition that he / she shall remain present before the Court
concerned during trial and shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437 (3) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
Certified copy, as per rules.
