High CourtsSingle Bench

Narayan Kumar vs State Of Orissa

Orissa High Court · Decided on 3 May 2024 · Citation: (2024) 05 OHC CK 0049

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.K. Mohapatra, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(b)(ii)(C), 37
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 4099 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 729 words

A.K. Mohapatra, J

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2.

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.

3.

This is an application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the Petitioner for bail in connection with Govt. Railway Police Station, Bhubaneswar P.S. Case No.32 of dt.04.03.2024, corresponding to T.R. Case No.112 of 2024, pending in the Court of the learned District & Sessions Judge, Khurda at Bhubaneswar for alleged commission of offence under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act.

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that earlier this matter was not before any other Bench of this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner is in custody since 03.03.2024. He contended that the investigation has progressed substantially and final P.R. is likely to be filed very soon. Further, referring to the allegations made in the F.I.R., learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that keeping in view the quantity of ganja seized, i.e., 19 kgs. in two bags i.e. 9.3 kg and 9.7 kgs each, was recovered from exclusive and conscious possession of the Petitioner. Further contended that the quantity of the contraband ganja was recovered from the petitioner, which was less than the commercial quantity, a bar under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not attracted. He further submitted that the Petitioner does not have any similar criminal antecedents. Further contends that the petitioner does not belongs to State of Odisha, therefore, the Petitioner is ready and willing shall abide by any terms and conditions as this Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.

5.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel on the other hand opposed the bail application of the Petitioner on the ground that such cases are increasing day-by-day and no leniency should be shown to the petitioner. He further submitted that the Petitioner belongs to State of Bihar, therefore, release of the Petitioner be difficult to ensure the appearance of the Petitioner before the Trial Court during trial. Further contends that the Investigation is still on. In such view of the matter, he submitted that the bail application of the Petitioner be rejected at this juncture.

6.

Having heard the learned counsels appearing for the respective parties and on a careful examination of the surrounding facts and circumstances of the present case, further keeping the view the period of detention of the Petitioner in jail custody and the fact that the Petitioner does not have any similar criminal antecedent, this Court is inclined to release the Petitioner on bail subject to imposition of stringent conditions.

7.

Hence, it is directed that the Petitioner be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing bail bond of Rs.35,000/- (Rupees Thirty Five thousand) with two local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned court in seisin over the matter subject to the following terms and conditions:

I) The Petitioner shall also file an affidavit before the Trial Court with regard to indicating there his residential details other details like Aadhar No., Phone No. before the jurisdictional police station & further release of the Petitioner shall be subject to verification of such details as would be furnished by any relative of the Petitioner in the shape of an affidavit.

II) he shall not be involved in any offence of similar nature while on bail;

III) he shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or try to threaten or influence the witnesses in any manner whatsoever;

IV) he shall not make any default in attending the court during trial on each date without fail;

V) he shall appear before the concerned Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on ‘Sunday’ in between 10.00 A.M. to 1.00 P.M. till conclusion of the trial.

Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

8.

It is further directed that the bail granted to the Petitioner be subject to the condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the Petitioner. In the event the Petitioner is having any similar criminal antecedent under the offences of NDPS Act, this bail order shall automatically stand revoked.

9.

BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

10.

Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.

..…………………………………