High CourtsSingle Bench

Rohit Kumar vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 23 May 2024 · Citation: (2024) 05 OHC CK 0294

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.K. Mohapatra, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(b)(ii)(B), 37
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 5058 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 713 words

A.K. Mohapatra, J

1.

This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State-Opposite Party. Perused the materials placed before this Court.

3.

The present bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by the Petitioner for regular bail relating to Bhubaneswar GRPS Case No.66 of 2024, corresponding to T.R. Case No.226 of 2024, pending before the learned Special Judge, Sonepur, for alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act.

4.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that earlier this matter was not before any other Bench of this Court. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner is in custody since 26.04.2024. He also contended that the investigation has progressed substantially and the final charge-sheet is likely to be filed soon. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further contended that as per allegation of the FIR, that the Petitioner was arrested from Bhubaneswar Railway Station when he was carrying a total quantity of 5.7 kg of contraband ganja. The alleged quantity of contraband ganja recovered from the possession of the Petitioner is less than the commercial quantity, therefore, the bar under section 37 is not attracted to the facts of the present case. It was also contended that the Petitioner does not have any similar criminal antecedent. In such view of the matter, learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner be released on bail on any terms and condition which the Petitioner undertakes to abide by while on bail.

5.

Learned counsel for the State on the other hand contended that the allegations made in the FIR are serious in nature. It was further contended that the Petitioner is an outsider, therefore, in the event he is released on bail he might abscond justice which might lead to delay in conclusion of trial. Learned counsel for the State opposed the release of the Petitioner in view of the nature and seriousness of allegation made against the Petitioner. Therefore, he submitted that the prayer for bail of the Petitioner be rejected at this juncture.

6.

Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties and on careful consideration of the surrounding facts as well as materials on record, and the fact that the alleged quantity of contraband article is less than the commercial quantity and the bar under section 37 is not attracted to the facts of the present case, and the fact that the Petitioner does not have any similar criminal antecedents, this Court is inclined to release the Petitioner on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.30,000/-(Rupees Thirty Thousand) with one local solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned court in seisin over the matter. Release of the Petitioner shall also be subject to following conditions:-

i) The Petitioner shall also file an affidavit before the Trial Court indicating therein his residential details and other details like Aadhar No., Phone No. before the jurisdictional police station and the release of the Petitioner shall be subject to verification of the aforesaid details and such details as would be furnished by any relative of the Petitioner in the shape of an affidavit.

ii) he shall not be involved in any offence of similar nature while on bail;

iii) he shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence or try to threaten or influence the witnesses in any manner whatsoever,

iv) he shall not make any default in attending the court during trial on each date without fail.

v) he shall appear before the concerned Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on 'Sunday’ in between 10.00 A.M to 1.00 PM. till conclusion of the trial.

Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

7.

It is further directed that the bail granted to the Petitioner is subject to the condition that the court below shall verify whether the Petitioner is having any similar criminal antecedent. In the event it is found that the Petitioner is having similar any criminal antecedent, this bail order shall automatically stand revoked. Violation of any of the terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of bail.

8.

The BLAPL is, accordingly, disposed of.

.....…………………………..