High CourtsSingle Bench

Naseeb Kaur vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 29 July 2021 · Citation: (2021) 07 UK CK 0222

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Land Revenue Act, 1901 — Section 41
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 1384 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 177 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

According to the petitioner, she filed an application under Section 41 of Land Revenue Act, 1901 seeking demarcation of land, which was allotted to

her. The said application was made by the petitioner on 18.11.2016.

2.

By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief:-

(i) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to act upon the application of the petitioner dated 18.1.2016 (Annexure No. 3 to this

petition) and handover the possession to the petitioner.

3.

From the prayer made in the writ petition, it is clear that petitioner is not in possession over the land in question. Under the garb of demarcation,

petitioner wants possession over the land in dispute. The proceedings under Section 41 of the Land Revenue Act are not meant for obtaining

possession of land.

4.

In such view of the matter, the relief, as claimed in the writ petition, cannot be granted. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the

petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for claiming possession.