High CourtsSingle Bench

Nazar vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 10 March 2023 · Citation: (2023) 03 KL CK 0098

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr Kauser Edappagath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 294(b), 323, 354, 506
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 1824 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 534 words

Dr Kauser Edappagath, J

1.

This application is filed u/s 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.

2.

The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.171/2023 of Pathanamthitta Police Station. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506 and

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that on 02.02.2023 at about 3.30 p.m., the applicant at his brother's house at Kulasekharapathy attacked his brother and when the defacto complainant intervened, he attacked her by holding her hair and slapping on her shoulders with an intention to outrage her modesty and thereby committed the offence.

4.

I have heard Sri. Vineeth V., the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. C.S. Hrithwik, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to get bail. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6.

I went through the F.I. Statement. It would show that the applicant went to the house of his brother and assaulted him. During the scuffle, the defacto complainant intervened. At that time, the applicant attacked her as well by pulling her hair. There is nothing to show that the said act was done by the applicant with intention to outrage her modesty. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations levelled against the applicant, his custodial interrogation does not appear to be necessary. For these reasons, it is a fit case where pre-arrest bail can be granted to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for `1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.