High CourtsSingle Bench

Sarath Kumar ES vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 29 March 2023 · Citation: (2023) 03 KL CK 0275

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294(b), 323, 324, 354, 452
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 2162 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 548 words

Dr. Kauser Edappagath, J

1.

This application is filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.

2.

The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.113/2023 of Pulikeezhu Police Station. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 294(b), 452, 323, 324 and 354 read with 34 of the IPC.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that on 15.2.2023 at 3 pm, the applicant along with the remaining accused trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant, assaulted him with stone and when wife of the defacto complainant intervened, the applicant beat on her face, pushed her down with intent to outrage her modesty and thereby committed the offences.

4.

I have heard Sri. T.P. Pradeep, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. C.S. Hrithwik, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to get bail. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

6.

A reading of the FIS would show that there was a scuffle between the defacto complainant and the applicant and during the scuffle, the wife of the defacto complainant intervened and the applicant pushed her down. There is nothing to suggest that the said act was done by the applicant with intent to outrage her modesty. Moreover, there is a counter case. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations levelled against the applicant, his custodial interrogation does not appear to be necessary. For these reasons, it is a fit case where pre-arrest bail can be granted to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The  applicant  shall  not  leave  the  State  of  Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.