High CourtsSingle Bench

Tarzan Mahakud @ Papu vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 24 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 OHC CK 0087

HON’BLE JUDGES
B. P. Routray, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 164, 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 109, 120B, 302
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No.1651 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 300 words

B.P. Routray, J

Heard Mr. R.N. Rout, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. G.N. Rout, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for Opposite Party - State.

This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of bail to the Petitioner Tarzan Mahakud @ Papu in connection with Jharpokharia P.S.

Case No.62 of 2019 corresponding to S.T. Case No.09 of 2020 pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Baripada for alleged

commission of offence under Sections 302/109/120-B/34 of the Indian penal Code.

It is submitted that the Petitioner is inside custody since 10th June, 2019 and there is no direct material against him. Further the other co-accused,

namely Thakurmani Singh standing on the same footing with the Petitioner has already been released on bail by this Court in BLAPL No.11090 of

2019.

After hearing learned State counsel and considering the statements of the witnesses including Chaitanya Prasad Singh and further considering the

release of other co-accused on bail, it is directed to release the Petitioner on bail in the aforesaid case on such terms and conditions to be fixed by the

learned court in seisin over the matter including the condition that, the Petitioner shall not dissuade any witness directly or indirectly by way of

inducement, threat or promise acquainted with the facts of the case from disclosing such facts before the Court or tamper with the evidence.

The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order available

in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide Court’s

Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798, dated 15th April, 2021.

………………………