AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
16 paragraphs · 300 wordsP. Sam Koshy, J
Present is an appeal filed by the Insurance Company under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles, Act assailing the award dated 20/09/2017 passed by
the learned Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Katghora, District Korba (C.G.) in Motor Accident Claim Case No.04/2015. Vide the said
impugned award, the Tribunal in an injury case under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act has awarded a compensation of Rs.1,54,146/- with
interest @ 9% per annum from the date of application.
The contention of the counsel for the appellant/Insurance Company is that, the vehicle at the time of accident was seized by the Election
Commission of the State and that it was being used for election purpose and therefore, if at all if, there is any liability, that liability should have been
fastened upon the State Government or the Election Commission and not upon the Insurance Company. He further contended that, the vehicle not
having a valid permit and fitness certificate so also there was an element of contributory negligence in the accident to occur.
Perusal of record would show that, the Insurance Company has not taking a plea of the vehicle being in the possession of the Election Commission
and that the vehicle was being operated in election duties. Neither is there any evidence in this regard, so also there was no evidence led by the
Insurance Company to establish that, the vehicle did not have a valid permit at the time of accident and also to establish the contributory negligence if
any.
In the absence of any cogent evidence led by the Insurance Company, the finding of the Tribunal cannot said to be either perverse or contrary to
the evidences which have come on record.
The appeal thus fails and is accordingly rejected.
