High CourtsSingle Bench

Pankaj Consul And Others vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 19 January 2024 · Citation: (2024) 01 UK CK 0110

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 226 Of 2024

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 184 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for respondent no.3 (through video conferencing) and Mr. Devendra Singh Bohra, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

2.

Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate, has submitted that as per the instructions received from the respondent no.3 on 18.01.2024, no action is being taken in pursuance of the impugned notice dated 02.01.2024. A fresh notice has been sent to the petitioners to present their case on 25.01.2024 before the respondent no.3 and only after that any further action will be taken.

3.

Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, Advocate, submitted that the fresh notice dated 18.01.2024 should be issued under Section 21 of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

4.

The petitioners are free to raise their pleas in accordance with law.

5.

On the request of both the parties, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

6.

Let a copy of this order be supplied, today itself, to the learned counsel for the parties, on payment of usual charges, as per rule.