High CourtsSingle Bench

Pankaj Kumar vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 5 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 PAT CK 0077

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 366A · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 164
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 37579 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 388 words
1.

Heard Mr. Subodh Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sailendra Kumar No. 1, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter

referred to as the ‘APP’) for the State.

2.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Phulwarisharif (Janipur) PS Case No.237 of 2016 dated 20.04.2016, instituted under Sections

366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

This is the 4th attempt for bail by the petitioner as earlier such prayer was rejected vide order dated 04.10.2016 in Cr. Misc. No. 40628 of 2016;

order dated 31.01.2018 in Cr. Misc. No. 1740 of 2018 and order dated 20.02.2019 in Cr. Misc. No. 78154 of 2018.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though as per the FIR, the petitioner along with others had kidnapped the 12 years old daughter of

the informant, but the very next day, she was recovered and has recorded a statement before the Court under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure

Code, 1973 in which she has clearly indicated that the petitioner did not commit any wrong with her and further the petitioner had promised to marry

her and she had also agreed but then it is said that she cannot marry him as he belonged to a different caste. Learned counsel submitted that there is

no allegation of any wrongdoing and the petitioner having no criminal antecedent is in custody since 23.04.2016.

5.

Learned APP submitted that the informant had alleged kidnapping of his minor granddaughter. However, he did not controvert that the girl has not

alleged any wrongdoing against him.

6.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail

upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional

Session Judge, XIIIth, Patna in Phulwari Sharif (Janipur) PS Case No.237 of 2016, subject to the conditions (i) that one of the bailors shall be a close

relative of the petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner and the bailors shall execute bond with regard to good behaviour of the petitioner and (iii) that the

petitioner shall cooperate in the case. Failure to cooperate shall lead to cancellation of his bail bonds.

7.

The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.