High CourtsSingle Bench

Ravi Kumar @ Anup vs State Of Bihar

Patna High Court · Decided on 8 January 2020 · Citation: (2020) 01 PAT CK 0153

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 366A · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 83367 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 420 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Maharajganj PS Case No. 87 of 2019 dated 26.03.2019 instituted under Sections 366A/34 of

the Indian Penal Code.

3.

The allegation against the petitioner and others is of kidnapping the minor daughter of the informant.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the allegation against the petitioner, as per the FIR, is that from his mobile number, the informant

was informed that upon the informant withdrawing the earlier case filed by his elder daughter against Pramod Rai and Rajesh Rai, his daughter would

return. It was submitted that the same is totally false and concocted as the petitioner has no connection with Rajesh Yadav/Rajesh Rai and even

during investigation, the police has found that the mobile number disclosed in the FIR belonged to Rajesh Yadav and not the petitioner. It was

submitted that the petitioner, his uncle, the informant as well as Rajesh Yadav are all neighbours and in the earlier case filed by the elder daughter of

the informant against Pramod Rai and Rajesh Rai, both sons of Banshi Rai, the paternal uncle of the petitioner, who is a practising advocate in the

Civil Court at Siwan, had moved petition for bail due to enmity, in the present case, the petitioner has also been named. Learned counsel submitted that

the petitioner is working abroad since more than 10 years and has three children to take care of. It was further submitted that the petitioner has no

criminal antecedent. Learned counsel submitted that the younger daughter of the informant, who is said to be the victim in the present case is in fact

living with her maternal aunt at Panipat in the State of Haryana and the petitioner has been implicated falsely with mali fide intention.

5.

Learned APP submitted that the victim girl has still not returned.

6.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender

before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-V, Siwan in Maharajganj PS Case No. 87 of 2019,

subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

7.

The application stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.