High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

PARAMJEET KAUR AND ANR. vs STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 3 January 2017 · Citation: (2017) 01 P&H CK 0229

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gurmit Ram
RESULT
Disposed
CASE NUMBER
40-2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 238 words
1.

Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is for

issuance of a direction to the official respondents to protect the lives and liberty of the

petitioners and not to harass them at the instance of respondent Nos.4 to 6.

2.

Notice of motion.

3.

At the asking of the Court, Mr.Daljeet Singh Virk, AAG, Punjab, accepts

notice on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 3.

4.

The petitioners have got married against the wishes of their parents. They

are stated to be major. The copy of marriage certificate is Annexure P-3. In support of

her proof of age, petitioner No.1 has placed on record a copy of Matriculation

Examination Certificate (Annexure P-1) wherein the date of her birth is mentioned as

20.9.1986, whereas petitioner No.2 has placed on record a copy of Matriculation

Examination Certificate (Annexure P-2) wherein his date of birth is mentioned as

17.10.1987. They have also moved a representation (Annexure P-5) before respondent

No.2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, Police District Khanna, District Ludhiana for

protection of their lives and liberty.

5.

Without adverting to the merits of the controversy, the present petition is

disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 - Senior Superintendent of Police,

Police District Khanna, District Ludhiana to take appropriate action on the said

representation.

6.

This order has nothing to do with regard to validity or invalidity of the

marriage of the petitioners.