High CourtsSingle Bench

PAUL MOSIS MASIH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 12 March 2018 · Citation: (2018) 03 CHH CK 0148

HON’BLE JUDGES
RAJENDRA CHANDRA SINGH SAMANT
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 509 (B) · Information Technology Act, 2000 — Section 66(c), 67, 67(A)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
MCRC No. 8109 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 395 words
1.

Heard.

2.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who have been

arrested in connection with Crime No. 467/2017 registered at Police Station- Telibandha, District â€" Raipur (Chhattisgarh) for the offence punishable

under Sections 509 (B) of Indian Penal Code & 66(c), 67, 67 (A) of Information Technology Act, 2000.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has falsely been implicated in this case as no case is made out against him on the basis

of the material available in the charge sheet. It is submitted that the applicant is in detention since 11.11.2017 and he is ready to abide by all the

conditions and directions, which may be imposed while granting bail to him. Hence, it is prayed that applicant be enlarged on regular bail.

4.

Learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submits that the since applicant has defamed and insulted the victim, therefore, he is not

entitled for the grant of regular bail.

5.

Heard both the parties and perused the case diary.

6.

According to the case of the prosecution, applicant and the complainant/victim became face-book friends, and after exchange of their Facebook

account Ids' & Passwords, applicant proposed to the complainant for marriage, which was refused by the complainant. Subsequently, applicant

misused the facebook Ids' of the victim and changed the password and posted obscene and objectionable photos of the complainant in her facebook

profile. Thereafter, the applicant continued to threat her, that he will further defame her and because of which this FIR has been lodged.

7.

Considering the material present in the case diary, and out of the total offences registered against the applicant, only the offence under Section 67-

A of IT Act is non bailable offence, whereas other offences are bailable ofence and that there is no substantial progress in the trial, hence, I am of this

opinion that applicant should be benefited with grant of regular bail.

8.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his

furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, for his appearance as

and when directed.Â