High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 07 DEL CK 0202

Pintu & Anr @APPELLANT@Hash Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi & Anr

Delhi High Court · Decided on 11 July 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRL.M.C. 2524 OF 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 406 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

Crl. M.A. 8974/2018 (Exemption) in Crl. M.C. 2524/2018

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.Â

Crl. M.C. 2524/2018 & Crl. M.C. 2529/2018

1.

The petitioner, in Crl. M.C. 2524/2018, seeks quashing of FIR No. 6 of 2011 under Sections 324/326 of the IPC registered at Police Station Kirti

Nagar, Delhi and the petitioners, in Crl. M.C. 2529/2018, seek quashing of FIR No. 5 of 2011 under Sections 324/326/34 of the IPC registered at

Police Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi, based on a settlement.Â

2.

The subject FIRs were registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties over trivial issues. The petitioners as well as

complainants work in the same area. It is contended that the subject FIRs are cross FIRs.Â

3.

Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation held at Delhi Mediation Centre,

Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and the settlement agreement dated 05.05.2017 has been executed. The parties who are present in Court undertake that they

shall not quarrel or cause disturbance in future. The undertaking is accepted.Â

4.

Status report has been filed. The said report does not indicate anything adverse, in so far as, the antecedents of the accused persons in these FIRs

are concerned.Â

5.

Complainants in the respective FIRs are present in court in person, represented by their counsels and are identified by the Investigating Officer.

They submit that they have settled the disputes with each other and are agreeable to the settlement and do not wish to press the criminal charges

against each other any further.Â

6.

In view of the fact that the disputes between the petitioners and respondents have been settled, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an

exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of

justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.Â

7.

In view of the above, the petitions are allowed. FIR No. 6 of 2011 under Sections 324/326 of the IPC registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar,

Delhi and FIR No. 5 of 2011 under Sections 324/326/34 of the IPC registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi and the consequent proceedings

emanating therefrom are, accordingly quashed.

8.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. Â