High CourtsSingle Bench

Poonam Chauhan vs Kusumlata And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 1 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 UK CK 0002

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Contempt Of Courts Act, 1971 — Section 12 · Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 7 Rule 11
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 298 Of 2011
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 231 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

This Contempt Petition has been filed under Section 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 31.03.2011

passed by Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun in Original Suit No. 186 of 2011 and also the order dated 28.06.2011 passed by Co-ordinate Bench

of this Court in A.O. No. 206 of 2011.

2.

By the order dated 31.03.2011, learned trial Court had restrained the defendants from creating any third party interest over the suit property. The

defendants filed an Appeal from Order against the said order and the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had stayed further proceedings in Original Suit

No. 186 of 2011.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 1 submits that the Contempt Petition has become infructuous on two counts. Firstly, the plaint of

Original Suit No. 186 of 2011 has been rejected on an application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. and, secondly, respondent no. 1, who had

executed sale deed through respondent no. 1, has passed away on 29.11.2015.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute this submission made on behalf of learned counsel for respondent no. 1.

5.

In view of subsequent events, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing survives in the Contempt Petition.

6.

Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is closed.

7.

Contempt notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged.