High CourtsSingle Bench

Vijay Kumar Gupta vs Puneet Sharma & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0354

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 39 Rule 4
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 518 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 152 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

This Contempt Petition was filed in the year 2017, alleging wilful disobedience of an interim order passed in A.O. No. 559 of 2017, whereby parties

were directed to maintain status quo as regards the land in dispute.

2.

Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 2 to 5 has produced in Court the final order dated 07.12.2017 passed in A.O. No. 559 of

2017.

3.

Perusal of the said order indicates that the appeal was disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to decide Temporary Injunction Application

filed by the plaintiffs, after considering the objection filed by the defendant under Order 39 Rule 4 C.P.C.

4.

Since A.O. No. 559 of 2017 itself has been disposed of, therefore, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this Contempt Petition pending.

5.

Accordingly, Contempt Petition is closed. Contempt notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged.