High CourtsSingle Bench

Pranam Rai vs Debika Subba & Anr

Meghalaya High Court · Decided on 24 February 2026 · Citation: (2026) 02 MEG CK 1738

HON’BLE JUDGES
W. Diengdoh, J
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal No. 11 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 118 words

W. Diengdoh, J

Ms. T.A. Sangma, learned counsel appears for the appellant.

None appears for the respondents.

The learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that this Court, in its earlier order dated 09.02.2026, had noted that the earlier notice issued upon the respondents have since been acknowledged, and affidavit of service in this regard has been filed by the appellant. However, since no one has appeared on behalf of the said respondents, let the appellant issue fresh notice upon the said respondents, calling upon them to appear on the next date, failing which necessary orders will be passed.

Copy of this order may also be annexed along with the said notice.

List this matter after 3(three) weeks.