Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Pranjali Shree & Others vs Vinayak Garg, Commissioner

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 9 February 2021 · Citation: (2021) 02 CAT CK 0045

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, J · Aradhana Johri, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 266 Of 2020 In Original Application No. 48 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 118 words

L. Narasimha Reddy, J

1.

This Contempt Case is filed by the applicant, alleging that the respondents did not implement the orders of the Tribunal in OA No.48/2020. The

direction was that in the event the applicants herein submit the applications in response to the advertisement, their case shall be considered, taking into

account the past service rendered by them in the respondent organization.

2.

A detailed compliance affidavit is filed. It is stated that after completion of the selection process, all the petitioners, except petitioner no.9 were

selected and out of selected candidates, the petitioner no.2 did not join and the name of the applicant figured in the merit list.

3.

The Contempt Petition is accordingly closed.