Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Satish Anand & Others vs Pradeep Kumar Joshi & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 25 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 CAT CK 0039

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manjula Das, J · Mohd. Jamshed, Member (A)
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 — Section 17
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 202 Of 2021 In Original Application No. 1394 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 145 words

Manjula Das, J

1.

This Contempt Petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 17 of Administrative Tribunals' Act, 1985, alleging non compliance of the interim order dated 27.07.2021 passed by this Tribunal in OA No.1406/2021 whereby the respondents were, inter alia, directed to receive the applications of the applicants, if they are eligible with reference to the last date of receipt of applications, i.e., 29.07.2021.

2.

At the outset, Mr. R.V. Sinha, learned counsel for the respondents states that the respondents have received the hard copies of the applications from the applicants and sent to the respondent-Union Public Service Commission.

3.

In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the respondents at the Bar, this Contempt Petition is closed as having become infructuous.

4.

This order is passed in the presence of Mr. Ranjit Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners.