High CourtsSingle Bench

Prem Lal vs Sunil Kumar

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 UK CK 0350

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 627 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 134 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent has produced in Court a letter received by his office from District Magistrate, Garhwal,

which is dated 07.02.2018.

2.

Perusal of the said letter reveals that a sum of Rs. 4,52,042/- has been paid to the petitioner.

3.

Learned Standing Counsel submits that the only direction was for payment of the monetary benefits to the petitioner, including arrears of salary,

which have been released. Thus, according to him, the order stands complied with.

4.

In view of the statement so made by learned Standing Counsel, Contempt Petition is closed. Contempt notice issued to respondent is hereby

discharged. However, petitioner shall be at liberty to seek recall of this order, if the statement made by learned Standing counsel, is found to be

incorrect.