High CourtsSingle Bench

Harish Lal vs Dheeraj Garbiyal

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 23 October 2021 · Citation: (2021) 10 UK CK 0097

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 429, 451, 452, 453 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 123 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioners were employee of Kumaon Mandal Vikas Nigam. They filed separate writ petitions, claiming arrears of salary from 01.01.2006 to 31.07.2009. Their writ petitions were allowed by a common judgment dated 12.10.2017.

2.

Today, Mr. A. Joshi, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party has made a statement that pursuant to the order passed by Writ Court, arrears of salary, as claimed by the petitioners, has been paid to them.

3.

Mr. Rajesh Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute such statement made on behalf of opposite party.

4.

In view of the submission so made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the Contempt petitions are closed. Notices issued to the opposite parties are hereby discharged.