AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
17 paragraphs · 262 wordsS.K. Panigrahi, J
I.A. No.1401 of 2021
This is an application under Section 389 of the Cr.P.C. for bail.
The appellant-R. Keshab has been convicted under Section 376(1) of the IPC by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Chatrapur vide order dated
30.11.2004 in S.T. Case No.114/2017 (CIS No.106/2017) and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for seven years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-in
default to undergo imprisonment for six months. He has also been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for five years under Section 452 of the IPC and
to pay fine of Rs.5,000/- in default to undergo imprisonment for three months. He has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for two years for the
offence under Section 506 of the IPC.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that since the appellant has already spent more than five years in judicial custody out of the total sentence
of seven years, he deserves to be enlarged on bail. Keeping that in view, the I.A. is allowed.
Let the appellant-R. Keshab be released on bail in the aforesaid case by the court in seisin over the matter on some stringent terms and conditions
as deemed just and proper.
The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.
As the restrictions due to resurgence of Covid-19 are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a print out of the order available in the
High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the Advocate concerned with his/her seal, in the manner prescribed vide
Court’s Office Order dated 7th January, 2022.
........................................................
