High CourtsSingle Bench

Radhakishan vs State Of Rajasthan And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 28 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 RAJ CK 0113

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — Section 3(1)(W), 3(2)(V), 14A · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 376(2)(n) · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 957 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 334 words

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

The instant criminal appeal has been filed under Section 14A of SC/ST (PA) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.335/2022, Police Station Pratap Nagar, District Bhilwara for the offences under Sections 376(2)(n) of IPC and Section 3(1)(W) and 3(2)(V)of SC/ST Act and against the order dated 12.05.2023 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act Cases, Bhilwara whereby the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

Counsel for the appellant submits that the prosecutrix was major and FIR in this case has been lodged after a considerable delay and the said delay has not at all been explained by the prosecutrix. Challan of the case has already been presented. The accused-appellant is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellant.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that the order rejecting the application for bail filed on behalf of the appellant, cannot be sustained and deserves to be set aside.

Consequently, the instant criminal appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 12.05.2023 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act Cases Bhilwara, is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Radhakishan S/o Dharmichand arrested in connection with FIR No.335/2022, Police Station Pratap Nagar, District Bhilwara shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.