Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Rahul vs Dr. C. Chandramouli & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 7 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 CAT CK 0027

HON’BLE JUDGES
A. K. Bishnoi, Member (A) · R.N. Singh, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 193 Of 2020 In Original Application No. 481 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 113 words

R. N. Singh, Member (J)

1.

It is not in dispute that the directions of this Tribunal in the aforesaid O.A. have been complied with. However, Shri N.S. Dalal, learned counsel for

the petitioner, submits that the respondents have taken more time than what was stipulated for compliance of the directions of this Tribunal passed in

the aforesaid OA.

2.

Shri J.P. Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents, submits that the delay in compliance was not willful but on account of administrative reasons.

3.

In the facts and circumstances, the CP is closed. Notices are discharged. Petitioner will be at liberty to raise his grievance, if any, still survives, in

accordance with law.