Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Ramesh Chand Yadav & Others vs Vijay Kumar Dev & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 20 November 2020 · Citation: (2020) 11 CAT CK 0086

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pradeep Kumar, Member (A) · R.N. Singh, Member (J)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 201 Of 2020 In Original Application No. 3384 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 121 words

R. N. Singh, Member (J)

1.

At the outset, learned counsel for the parties submit that in compliance of direction of this Tribunal, the respondents have passed an order.

However, learned counsel for petitioners submits that order so passed by the respondents is not in accordance with the relevant rules and law on the

subject.

2.

In view of the fact that the respondents have passed the order in pursuance of direction of this Tribunal, we are of the considered view that

substantial compliance of directions of this Tribunal has been made.

3.

Accordingly, CP is closed. Notices are discharged. However, the petitioners shall be at liberty to challenge the orders so passed by the respondents

in accordance with the law.