AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
32 paragraphs · 344 wordsThis application for anticipatory bail under sec.438 CrPC has
been filed in connection with FIR No.119/2016, Police Station-
Chohtan, District Barmer, for offences punishable under sections
147, 148, 149, 323, 342, 365, 379, 384, 427, 452 IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
complainant Deraj Ram has lodged FIR stating that the villagers
had taken a decision of imposing cost of Rs.15 Lacs on said
complainant, defaced him and made him roam around the village
after levelling allegations against him. Learned counsel for the
petitioners submits that at best the case can travel upto sec.385
IPC and no further. All the petitioners are villagers of village
Virdon Ka Tala, Bisarniya. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the
bail application.
Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicants as well as
learned Public Prosecutor.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the matter,
without commenting on the merits of this case, I deem it just and
proper to grant the benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-
applicants under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed
that in the event of arrest of accused-applicant in connection with
FIR No.119/2016, Police Station, Chohtan, District Barmer the
accused-applicants - 1) Raichand Ram s/o Bagta Ram, 2)
HanumanRam s/o Poonma Ram, 3) Jasa Ram s/o Bhiya Ram, 4)
Poonma Ram s/o Gumana Ram and 5) Thakara Ram s/o Bhoma
Ram aforesaid shall be released on bail provided each of them
furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- along with
two sureties in the sum of Rs.25000/- each, to the satisfaction of
the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following
conditions:
(1) They shall make themselves available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (2) They shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;
(3) They shall not leave India without the previous permission of the trial court.
