High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajeesh vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 30 April 2021 · Citation: (2021) 04 KL CK 0245

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kauser Edappagath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 294(b), 279, 283, 308, 341, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 3183 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 481 words
1.

This is an application filed u/s 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking pre-arrest bail.

2.

The petitioner is the accused No.2 in Crime No. 250/2021 of Town West Police Station, Thrissur. The offences alleged are under Sections 279,

283, 341, 308, 294(b), 506 and Section 34 of IPC.

3.

The prosecution case in short is that on 29.3.2021 at 7 pm the petitioner and the accused No.1 who are the driver and conductor, respectively, of

the bus bearing registration No.KL-8/AE-6587 overtook the bus and put across the car driven by the de-facto complainant in front of Jayalakshmi

Silks at Poothole-Shankara Iyer road and the 2nd accused assaulted the de-facto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences.

4.

Heard both sides and perused the case diary.

5.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is absolutely innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He

further submitted that there are no materials to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime and hence he is entitled to get bail. The learned Public

Prosecutor opposed the bail application. She contended that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the petitioner and

if the petitioner is released on bail at this stage, it would affect the course of investigation.

6.

The only non-bailable offence alleged is Section 308 of IPC. There is nothing on record to attract the ingredients of Section 308 of IPC. No injury

has been sustained by the de-facto complainant as evident from the wound certificate. Considering the allegations levelled against the petitioner, his

custodial interrogation does not appear to be necessary. For all these reasons, the petitioner is entitled to pre-arrest bail on conditions.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The petitioner shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for `1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent

sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for the purpose of discovery, if

any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m on every Saturday until further orders. The petitioner

shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required by him.

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence of like nature while on bail.

(v) The petitioner shall not make any attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or any other way try to

tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The petitioner shall not leave State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.