Rajendra And Others vs State Of M.P

Prakash Shrivastava, J

Heard on the question of grant of bail.

This is an application made by the applicants under Section 439 Cr.P.C.for grant of bail during trial.

Notice of this application was served on the State counsel. Case diary as per the direction of this Court has been produced and it has been perused.

The applicants are facing trial for offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the M.P. Excise Act registered with Police Station A.S.I. Department,

Excise Circle, Maheshwar, District Khargone in Crime No.312/2020.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that 54 bulk liters of illicit liquor has been seized from the joint custody of present applicants and that this is

the first offence registered under Section 34(2) of the M.P.Excise Act. He further submits that the applicants are in custody since 20.10.2020 and the

offence is triable by the Magistrate. He further submits that the investigation is almost complete. He has further submitted that applicants are not

guilty of the alleged offence and they are not likely to commit any offence while on bail.

Learned counsel for the State has opposed the application for grant of bail.

On perusal of the case diary and considering the circumstances of the case, I find prima facie force in the submissions made by the counsel for

applicants. Hence, I am of the considered view that the application for grant of bail deserves to be allowed and is accordingly allowed.

The applicants are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.35,000/- (Rupees Thirty Five Thousand) each

with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial

Court for their appearance as and when directed.

The applicants will attend each hearing of their trial before the Trial Court out of which this bail arises. Any default in attendance in Court would result

in cancellation of the bail granted by this Court.