Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2020) 12 NCLT CK 0124

Rajendra Finance Private Limited And Ors. Vs

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 9 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Janab Mohammed Ajmal, J · V. Nallasenapathy, Member (Technical)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Company Petition (CAA) No. 977/MB Of 2020, Company Application (CAA) No. 545/MB Of 2020

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

231 paragraphs · 1,542 words

Sr.

No.

Para

(IV)","RD Report / Observations dated 2nd

December, 2020",Response of the Petitioner Companies.

(a),"In compliance of AS--14 (IND AS-

103), the Petitioner Companies shall

pass such accounting entries which

are necessary in connection with the

scheme to comply with other

applicable Accounting Standards

such as AS-5(IND AS8) etc.","So far as the observation in paragraph IV

(a) of the Report of the Regional Director

is concerned, the Learned Counsel for the

Petitioner Companies submits that in

addition to Compliance of AS-14, the

Petitioner Companies shall pass such

accounting entries which are necessary in

connection with the scheme to comply

with other applicable Accounting

Standards such as AS-5 etc.

(b),"As per Part â€"A-Definition Clause

3(3.7, 3.8 & 3.10) of the Scheme.

“The Appointed Dateâ€​ means the

1st April, 2019 or such other date

as the National Company Law

Tribunal (Tribunal) of Judicature at

Mumbai or other competent authority

may otherwise direct/fix. “The

Effective Dateâ€​ means the date on

which certified copies of the Order(s)

of the National Company Law

Tribunal at Mumbai vesting the

assets, properties, liabilities, rights,

duties, obligations and the like of all

the Transferor Companies in the

Transferee Company are filed with

the Registrar of Companies,

Maharashtra, after obtaining the

necessary consents, approval,

permissions, resolutions, agreements,

sanctions and orders in this regard.

Record Date"" means the date to be

fixed by the Board of the Directors

of Remi Finance and Investment

Private Limited, for the purposes of

issue and allotment of shares of Remi

Finance and Investment Private

Limited as may be applicable and

relevant in accordance with this

Scheme of Amalgamation.

In this regard, it is submitted that

Section 232 (6) of the Companies

Act, 2013 states that the scheme

under this section shall clearly

indicate an appointed date from

which it shall be effective and the

scheme shall be deemed to be

effective from such date and not at a

date subsequent to the appointed

date. However, this aspect may be

decided by the Hon’ble Tribunal

taking into account its inherent

powers.

Further, the Petitioner may be asked

to comply with the requirements and

clarified vide circular no. F.

No.7/12/2019/CL-1 dated

21.08.2019 issued by the Ministry of

Corporate Affairs.","So far as the observation in paragraph IV

(b) of the Report of the Regional Director

is concerned, the Learned

Counsel for the Petitioner Companies

submits that the Appointed Date is 1st

April, 2019 from which it shall be

effective and the scheme shall be deemed

to be effective from such date and not at

a date subsequent to the appointed date.

(c),"The Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly

seek the undertaking that this

Scheme is approved by the requisite

majority of members and creditors as

per Section 230(6) of the Act in

meetings duly held in terms of

Section 230(1) read with subsection

(3) to (5) of Section 230 of the Act

and the Minutes thereof are duly

placed before the Tribunal.","So far as the observation in paragraph IV

(c) of the Report of Regional Director is

concerned, the Petitioner Companies

undertake that this Scheme is approved by

the requisite majority of members and

creditors as per the directions issued in

terms of the NCLT order dated 28th

February, 2020.

(d),"Hon'ble NCLT may kindly direct the

petitioners to file an affidavit to the

extent that the Scheme enclosed to

Company Application & Company

Petition, are made and same and

there is no discrepancy/any

change/changes are made, for

changes if any liberty

be given to Central Government to

file further report if any required.","So far as the observation in paragraph IV

(d) of the Report of the Regional Director

is concerned, the Learned Counsel for the

Petitioner Companies submits that the

Petitioner undertakes that Scheme

enclosed to the Company Application and

the scheme enclosed to the Company

Petition are one & same there is no

discrepancy or

deviation.

(e),"The Petitioners under provisions of

section 230(5) of the Companies Act,

2013 have to serve notices to

concerned authorities which are

likely to be affected by

Amalgamation and to obtain NOC

from the concerned regulator like

RBI since the Company appears to be

finance Company. Further, the

approval of the scheme by this

Hon'ble Tribunal may not deter such

authorities to deal with any of the

issues arising after giving effect to

the scheme. The decision of such

Authorities is binding on the

Petitioner Company(s).","So far as the observation in paragraph IV

(e) of the Report of the Regional Director

is concerned, the Learned Counsel for the

Petitioner Companies submits that the

scheme by this Hon’ble Tribunal may

not deter any authorities to deal with any

of the issues arising after giving effect to

the scheme and that the decision of

authorities is binding on the Petitioner

Company (s). The Petitioner Companies

further state that RBI approval is not

required as Companies are not NBFC

Company.

(f),"Petitioner Company have to

undertake to comply with section

232(3)(i) of Companies Act, 2013,

where the transferor company is

dissolved, the fee, if any, paid by the

transferor company on its authorised

capital shall be set-off against any

fees payable by the transferee

company on its authorised capital

subsequent to the amalgamation and

therefore, petitioners to affirm that

they comply the provisions of

the section.","So far as the observation in paragraph IV

(f) of the Report of the Regional Director

is concerned, the Learned Counsel for the

Petitioner Companies submits that the

setting off of fees paid by the Transferor

Company on its Authorized Share Capital

shall be accordance with provisions of

section 232(3)(i) of the Companies Act,

2013.

(g),"As regards Part -B Clause 14(14.1

to 14.3) of Scheme (Combination of

Authorized Share Capital); upon the

sanction of the Scheme, the

authorized share capital of

Transferee Company Shall

automatically stand increased

without any further act, instrument or

deed on the Transferee Company. In

this regard it is submitted that

Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly direct

the petitioner to comply with

provisions of Section 13, Section 14

& Section 61 of the Companies Act,

2013 or any other

applicable provision of the Act,","So far as the observation in paragraph

IV (g) of the Report of the Regional

Director is concerned, the Learned

Counsel for the Petitioner Companies

submits that the Petitioner the petitioner in

the authorized share capital of Transferee

Company Shall automatically stand

increased without any further act,

instrument or deed on the Transferee

Company and that the Petitioner

Company will to comply with provisions of

Section 13, Section

14 & Section 61 of the Companies Act,

2013 or any other applicable provision of

the Act for increase.

(h),"The Scheme at Para 13 (13.3) to

provides that excess of assets over

liabilities of all the Transferor

Companies shall be transferred to

Capital Reserved Account. In this

regards it is submitted that such

excess to be treated as reserve

arising out of Amalgamation and

hence be not available for

distribution of dividend and other

related purpose.","So far as the observation in paragraph IV

(h) of the Report of the Regional Director

is concerned, the Learned Counsel for the

Petitioner Companies submits that the

Petitioner Company undertakes that the

excess of assets over liabilities of all the

Transferor Companies and that such

excess to be treated as reserve arising out

of Amalgamation.

(i) The Scheme, with the Appointed Date fixed as 1st April, 2019 placed at pages 266 to 291 (Exhibit â€" K) of the Company Petition, is hereby",,

sanctioned. It shall be binding on the Petitioner Companies involved in the Scheme and all concerned including their respective Shareholders.,,

(ii) The Transferor Companies shall be dissolved without being wound up.,,

(iii) The Registrar of this Tribunal shall issue the certified copy of this Order along with the Scheme forthwith. Petitioner Companies are directed to,,

file a copy of this Order along with a copy of the Scheme of Amalgamation with the Registrar of Companies concerned, electronically along with E-",,

Form INC-28 within 30 days from the date of receipt of the Order from the Registry.,,

(iv) The Petitioner Companies shall lodge a copy of this Order and the Scheme duly authenticated by the Deputy Registrar of this Tribunal, within 60",,

days from the date of receipt of the Order, with the concerned Superintendent of Stamps, for the purpose of adjudication of stamp duty, if any,",,

payable.,,

(v) The Petitioner Companies shall comply with all the undertakings given by them.,,

(vi) The Petitioner Companies shall, within 15 days of receipt of this order, issue newspaper publications with respect to approval of the Scheme, in",,

the same newspapers in which previous publications were issued.,,

(vii) The Petitioner Companies shall take all consequential and statutory steps required under the provisions of the Act in pursuance of the Scheme.,,

(viii) All concerned shall act on a copy of this Order along with the Scheme duly authenticated by the Registrar of this Tribunal.,,

(ix) Any person interested in the above matter shall be at liberty to apply to the Tribunal for any directions that may be necessary.,,

ORDER,,

The matter is taken up on VC. Heard Mr. Ahmed Chunawala, Counsel for the Petitioner, Ms. Rupa Sutar, Deputy Director from the Office of the",,

Regional Director (WR), MCA, Mumbai and Mr. V.P. Katkar, Official Liquidator of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court. Petition allowed vide",,

separate orders.,,