High CourtsDivision Bench

Rajinder Kumar vs State Of H.P. & others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 8 May 2020 · Citation: (2020) 05 SHI CK 0020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sureshwar Thakur, J · Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 1426 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 130 words

Per Sureshwar Thakur, J

1.

In the interest of justice, the authority concerned, wherebefore whom, the representation, of, the petitioner, claiming therein, the relief(s), canvassed, in the writ petition, is subjudice, is, directed to decide the afore representation, within four weeks, from today.

2.

Needless to say, in case any decision, adverse to the writ petitioner, is, recorded by the authority concerned, thereupon, it is open to the writ petitioner, to re-agitate his grievance(s), in accordance with law, before the Court concerned. The authority concerned, is, directed to issue notice(s), to the litigant(s) concerned, directing him/them, to record his/their appearance, before him, on the date, reflected in the notice.

3.

Consequently, the instant writ petition is disposed of. Also, the pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of. No costs.