High CourtsSingle Bench

Rajiv Pradhan & Anr vs State Of Sikkim

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 17 February 2022 · Citation: (2022) 02 SIK CK 0009

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 10 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 99 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

After hearing the matter for some time Mr. Nayan Nepal, learned counsel for the petitioner desires to withdraw this petition to file afresh, in view of

the fact that the petitioner no.1 who is an accused in the criminal proceedings pending before the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, East Sikkim

at Gangtok is not a signatory to the compromise deed entered between the family members of the petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.2. He is permitted

to do so. The Crl. M.C. No. 10 of 2021 stands disposed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.