High CourtsSingle Bench

Arun Kumar Gupta vs State Of Sikkim & Ors.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 28 March 2024 · Citation: (2024) 03 SIK CK 0094

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 39 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 89 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The learned Additional Advocate General submits that the matter has been resolved amicably between the parties and intimation to that effect is given to the petitioner. Mr. Ranjit Prasad, learned counsel submits that Mr. A. Moulik, learned Senior Counsel representing the petitioner is out of station and therefore, could not appear before this Court today. He seeks a week’s time to study the matter. Not objected by the learned Additional Advocate General for the respondents. Time sought for is granted.

2.

List on 05.04.2024.